Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 261 - 280
of 25,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 10:30 am
Both sides have been granted Leave to Appeal.Here were my observations about the decision from the Federal Court of Appeal decision from April 22, 2020.Interveners, start your engines.HPK [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:28 pm
If you're an insurance company who's just been spanked at trial for $10 million in punitive damages, as well an additional half a million dollars in the other side's attorney's fees, because you (allegedly) illegally denied plaintiff's disability insurance claim, it's gotta bring at least a slight smile to your face to find out that your panel in the Ninth Circuit consists of Judges Hall, O'Scannlain, and Ikuta.Punitive damage and fee award… [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
You never want to find your name on the wrong side of the “v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
The state action principles are the same, and even the conservative side of the Court has been relatively resolute against sectarian endorsements. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
The post Guest Post by Adam Schulman on KBJ's Opinion in <i>Ross v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 10:04 am
Hurley v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Steelers may have been the official “Big Game” this year, but Brady v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
Hmm: rock, paper, scissors; PR v. guns – which is stronger? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
Hmm: rock, paper, scissors; PR v. guns – which is stronger? [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:27 pm
Not even counting the dissent.It's a case in which Gibson Dunn gets disqualified for using a document that's privileged (even though Gibson thought the privilege had been waived) that was inadvertently produced by the other side -- not in litigation, but elsewhere.As I said, there's also a dissent.The opinion tells you what not to do -- at least from here on out -- when you see a document that might be privileged and inadvertently produced. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
Briefs in opposition have not yet been filed. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
Though withdrawals could be made, the money would have been stolen from others. . . . [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
Last week, the court granted review in Ricci v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
In the recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case, The Bank of NY Mellon Corp v. [read post]
Tax Court of Canada Limits Shopping for Expert Witnesses: Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. The Queen
12 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Does that mean that the other side is debarred from getting the help of any expert evidence because all the experts have been taken up by the other side? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
Uncertainty surrounding patent eligibility jurisprudence has been a thorn in the side of many patent applicants, patent holders, scholars, and judges for years, leading voices in the patent sector to issue repeated, though unavailing, calls for legislative action. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 10:06 am
I covered two of yesterday's arguments for SCOTUSBlog--in Perry v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:18 pm
The fact that an issue was actively disputed at trial, and even the fact that there might have been "substantial evidence" in favor of both sides of the dispute (e.g., that would preclude summary judgment), doesn't matter.That's a great -- and rare -- holding. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
Could this have been done, or would it have been sacreligious? [read post]
