Search for: "Simmons v. Ins*" Results 261 - 280 of 714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
 * Your one-off chance to boost your EU trade mark portfolio: how it will workNow that OHIMhas decided how Article 28 declarations are going to work, Darren Meale, of Simmons & Simmons, London, offers his further thoughts on what to expect. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm by Jamie Markham
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005); and life without parole for nonhomicide crimes committed by defendants under 18, Graham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm by Jamie Markham
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005); and life without parole for nonhomicide crimes committed by defendants under 18, Graham v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Former Guest Kat Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons, London) explains.* BREAKING: AG Szpunar says that fair compensation for private copying can be funded through state budget but amount cannot be established ex anteEleonora reports on Advocate General Maciej Szpunar's Opinion in EGEDA C-470/14 [here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Spanish Supreme Court seeking clarification as to whether private copying can be public-funded and, if… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:17 am by Ben
The case has yet to get to court by Dylan gives us a thorough review of the position of jokes under copyright in US law - in particular the decision Foxworthy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm by Jamie Markham
Simmons that the Harp rule could not survive intervening case law from the Supreme Court (Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm by Jamie Markham
Simmons that the Harp rule could not survive intervening case law from the Supreme Court (Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:42 pm by Giles Peaker
There was also the Simmons v Castle 10 per cent uplift on all the general damages of £965.36. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
” And Simmons v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court also granted review of three other cases: a request to clarify when a lawsuit against federal officials is barred under the Federal Tort Claims Act because the same issue had been involved in an earlier lawsuit (Simmons v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Shoenfeld, Mark (1997), “Waging battle: Ashford v. [read post]