Search for: "Smith v. City of New York" Results 261 - 280 of 835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
Smith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863, however, sets out one significant exception to the general rule that eating lunch is not work. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, PER CURIAM In the Matter of City of Elmira v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
  New York City’s rent control could be Unconstitutional on any of three grounds:   1. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), To retrieve the text of any of the New York bills  listed below, go to [public.leginfo.state.ny.us] Bill No. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:51 am by admin
  Hope that was funded by the Rajah and not by Rajasthan   [In 1975], Gotham was bailed out by New York State and the federal government. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
NYC Adminstrative Code § 10-131(b) Defendant also argues that New York City's ban on the possession of air pistols, AC § 10-131(b), violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am by admin
Smith    Cities are for walking; it eases traffic congestion. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
On March 18, 2008, the New York Court of Appeals, which is New York's highest court, decided Appleton Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm by admin
I think not; apartments flourished in New York City throughout the boarding house’s heyday. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by admin
Escondido, both the decision itself (blue Georgia) and its syllabus (black Georgia), didn’t exculpate all rent control, such as New York City’s rent control being challenged in James Harmon’s lawsuit against New York City, from being a taking, it merely exculpated it of being a physical taking. [read post]