Search for: "Smith v. Res-Care, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 am by tom
As usual, our talented crew of LII Supreme Court Bulletin editors has analyzed the cases — just click on the casenames for a careful exploration of what they’re about: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 09-1205    SMITH, KEITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
" In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
More on that, too.Consolidation’s been on our brain a bit, you might say.That’s why we’re beyond pleased by the recent decision in Agrofollajes, S.A. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:40 pm by Mark Herrmann
Junior partner enlists associate who promptly types away that in the case of Smith v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Posner has written about this concept before, notably in In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1299-1300 (7th Cir. 1995). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by admin
  These conditions were tested in the Texas judicial system with the case of Inwood North Homeowners’ Association Inc. v Charlie Harris, Jr., et al. and Rolando M. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:36 am by Lawrence Cunningham
  Other cases supporting various assertions in this post are: Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]