Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court" Results 261 - 280 of 830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 9:10 pm
Listen to Trust Claims and Non-Married Spouses This week on Hull on Estates, David Smith and Megan Connolly reference the case Belvedere v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:26 am by William A. Ruskin
  The Bridgeport Superior Court’s decision is arguably a departure from the precedent established in Burkert v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:40 pm by Edward Smith
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, a Vallejo resident was sentenced by the Superior Court of Napa County to a probation period of three years and had her driver’s license privileges revoked permanently for fatally striking a cyclist with her vehicle in 2016. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:06 am by Jessica Smith
Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989), the Court held that Pearce’s presumption of vindictiveness does not apply when the original sentence was entered after a guilty plea. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:39 pm
"Justice Smith and Centra dissented based on their opinion that the lease's insurance clause as a whole evidenced an intent of the parties that Superior Sign be required to name Kassis as an additional insured, even though the lease did not actually say so.A reversal with two dissents at the Appellate Division means an appeal by right to the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
Because the superior-court petition was untimely, it wasn't "properly filed" under Pace v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice differentiated these different approaches to intermediary liability in Baglow v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit on May 07, 2001, the court found that the explanation provided by Luzerne County [NJ] for terminating county employee Rodney Smith -- violation of its drug and alcohol policy -- did not tell Smith what he did to bring about his termination in sufficient detail as to justify the district court's summarily dismissing his complaint.The court said that there "does not seem to be anything in the record… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]