Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)" Results 261 - 280 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta posted a letter from two government watchdogs requesting that the Office of Special Counsel investigate White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s comments on the State Department dissent memo. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am by Hannah Kris
Scott Smith, Howard Marshall and David Resch, three top cybersecurity experts at the FBI are leaving the government, reports the Journal. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
Additionally, the Department of Justice argues that under the current law, messages are unprotected if they are opened, read, or in the trash or drafts folder. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
  Zuress and Weatherill presented the question whether “dual-status technicians” who perform civilian roles within military departments may sue the government for employment discrimination under Title VII; Witt relatedly asked the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
The firm eventually became Farr & Taranto when Smith left for Jenner & Block and Joel Klein left for the Department of Justice. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm by Priscilla Smith
Priscilla (Cilla) Smith is a Senior Fellow and Reproductive Justice Program Director at the Information Society Project at the Yale Law School. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
The Justice Department has now filed a notice of appeal and a motion to partially stay U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm by Howard Friedman
Here is a portion of what Kagan had to say in the memo:In the case, Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am by Marty Lederman
The Department of Justice has not, to my knowledge, ever repeated this Bork/Levi “dual filing” strategem. [read post]