Search for: "Snowden v. Snowden"
Results 261 - 280
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
Breaking news in drone bases: President Barack Obama sent a War Powers letter to Congress today noting that as of October 12th, 2015, approximately 90 U.S. troops had deployed to Cameroon to “conduct airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations in the region. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
Yet the EU, no less than the US, has less room to be hypocritical in the post-Snowden era. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am
Especially in the wake of the Snowden disclosures, more customers consider privacy policies when selecting their digital products and services. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
In this post, I will begin to explore whether there is a practical way to amend US surveillance law that might satisfy the concerns expressed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Schrems’ concerns originated from revelations that came to public light as part of the Snowden affair in 2013, when EU citizens became aware that US intelligence services, in particular the National Security Agency (‘NSA’) could gain access to the data transferred from the EU to the US without US law and practice limiting such surveillance activity. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case, entitled Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:32 pm
The US lost billions of dollars in business following the Snowden revelations about PRISM and other US surveillance operations. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court was ruling in a case brought by Max Schrems, an Austrian student and privacy campaigner who, in the wake of the Snowden revelations of mass surveillance, contested the fact that data about Europeans and others was being stored in the US by tech companies such as Facebook. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The decision is here: Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
Rancho De Calistoga v City of Calistoga, 2015 WL 5158703 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least… [read post]
