Search for: "Sorrels v. Sorrels" Results 261 - 280 of 373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
In any event, Breyer said, the statute met the First Amendment standard previously applied by the Court when the government sought to regulate commercial speech.The decision is Sorrell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Gregory Dell
Sorrell V UNUM Life Insurance Company of America is an example of the above mentioned situation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman Earlier this month, I attended an event at University of Colorado Boulder called “The Economics of Privacy,” sponsored by the Silicon Flatirons center. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Sorrell didn’t touch the false/misleading v. nonmisleading commercial speech distinction, though, and as long as that’s in place it’s possible to justify a slimmed-down ROP. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:37 pm by Berin Szoka
Adam Thierer has already provided an excellent overview of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am by Christine Farley
The question of when, if ever, strict scrutiny is appropriate when the regulation at issue is directed to commercial speech was provoked by the court’s 2011 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]