Search for: "Southern States Holding, Inc."
Results 261 - 280
of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 6:49 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York against the same Respondents. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:03 am
Nonetheless, Perrigo continued to report that it expected to redeem its $18 million in auction rates even after Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am
The December 10 order is incompatible with Hoffmann-La Roche and with what we hold in this opinion regarding notice. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm
Krys (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), 714 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2013); In re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., No. 08-13555 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Sierra Summit, Inc., 490 U.S. 844 (1989), required it to construe the provision narrowly in favor of state taxing authorities. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Sierra Summit, Inc., 490 U.S. 844 (1989), required it to construe the provision narrowly in favor of state taxing authorities. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:12 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:54 am
Cobleskill Stone Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
This decision comes only months after the Southern District of California’s October 2011 ruling in Dilts v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
Plaintiffs assert that Lilly holds an exclusive license to these products. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
In Rossco Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:17 pm
But the court stated the rule of law that holds that an expert opinion, without reason or explanation, does not establish a material fact. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
It states that it holds a federal registration on VERGE as a trademark and that the VERGE trademark has been used since at least as early as January 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:26 am
On February 22, 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York enjoined Apple, Inc. from proceeding with a planned vote at its annual shareholders’ meeting on amendments to certain provisions of its articles of incorporation on the grounds that the proposed amendments, which were presented as a single matter to be voted upon, likely violated SEC rules prohibiting the “bundling” of separate matters into a single vote. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:28 pm
The plaintiffs, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. and other publishing companies, alleged that the defendants operated a “chop shop” in which they altered textbooks intended for use and sale outside the United States so that they could be sold and used in the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:11 am
Phoenix Satellite Television US, Inc.) holding that unpaid interns are not protected against discrimination and harassment by the NYCHRL. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
We hold otherwise. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
DialAmerica Marketing, Inc., No. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:52 am
The hearing was held in Oxford, not in the Southern District where the State Farm v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:18 am
Morgan Securities, Inc. and J.P. [read post]
