Search for: "Southern Union Co. v. United States" Results 261 - 277 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
After careful review, we AFFIRM. 08a0049p.06 Watson Wyatt & Co v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
  The Board found that under the Supreme Court's decision in Chicago Teachers' Union Local 1 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Southern California Gas Co. (9th Cir. 2000) 219 F.3d 1063, where the overtime premium was determined by interpreting a CBA. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Taft    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus DEATH PENALTY CASE 07a0086p.06 2007/03/02 Natl Parks v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Charge filed by Vermont Telephone Co.; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(3). [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
General Counsel filed motion for partial summary judgment June 20, 2006. *** Southern Monterey County Hospital d/b/a George L. [read post]