Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
From Thursday's decision by Judge David Larimer in Carey v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:43 am
In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
Spelling counts. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
Congress was not required to spell out the application to Article V.The adoption of this view is important for several reasons. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In Hiller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Supreme Court hear our defense of S.B. 1070.” (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
(SEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
(SEC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
Illinois First District Appellate Court Reiterates Rule To Preserve Evidentiary Objection For Appeal
6 Nov 2007, 3:03 pm
The appellate court spelled out the rule. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
In the 1948 case Morgan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:28 am
This said, it's worth reiterating that it's always prudent to have this type of use spelled out clearly in the agreement. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
As stated by the SJC in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
In Ennis, Judge Gertner assails the application of the career offender guideline, and here is one of many choice snippets:This memorandum will address why in the sentencing of three defendants ... who qualify as "career offenders" under the United States Sentencing Guidelines after United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Certain states feel compelled to spell out in detail precisely what the regulators consider to be a “false and misleading” communication. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:16 am
Today's post is authored by David Depaolo and shared from http://daviddepaolo.blogspot.com .It's the long arm of the law.When the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed into law conservatives applauded that it would open up the forces of economic powers from Mexico that were previously running underground.Liberals said that NAFTA spelled the end of domestic work for Americans.Of course, neither of the extreme views became reality.What did become reality, however, is that… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm
Lucas v. [read post]