Search for: "Stark v State"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2021, 4:11 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
(We recently marked the 50th anniversary of Younger v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm
(As of now, viability falls somewhere around 24 weeks’ gestation — so the state of Mississippi’s law seems to be in stark conflict.) [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
The effects of this arrangement on the associational rights of fraternities, sororities, and their current and prospective members are stark. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:52 am
However, in Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 10:29 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
“ Tzystuck v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 10:38 am
Romano v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
When selling or purchasing a medical practice, it is important to consider many legal and practical aspects, including: the form of the transaction (stock v. asset purchase); how to value the assets of the practice taking into account fair market value and commercial reasonableness; the assignability of employee contracts; compliance with state and federal medical record retention laws, regulatory laws, and other relevant federal and state laws, including STARK… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
When selling or purchasing a medical practice, it is important to consider many legal and practical aspects, including: the form of the transaction (stock v. asset purchase); how to value the assets of the practice taking into account fair market value and commercial reasonableness; the assignability of employee contracts; compliance with state and federal medical record retention laws, regulatory laws, and other relevant federal and state laws, including STARK… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:41 am
In rejecting the defendants argument that the server test applied, the Nicklen court stated that the server test “is contrary to the text and legislative history of the Copyright Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:01 am
Martynski DDJ set out the requirements of the duty to make full and frank disclosure, as enumerated in Tugushev v Orlov [2019] EWHC 2031. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm
In 2016, the law society handled a complaint in Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Perhaps the state will establish protective habitats. [read post]