Search for: "State Of Delaware v. Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
The State of Connecticut, joined by Colorado, Delaware, New Mexico, Ohio, South Dakota, and Utah, filed a brief amicus curiae in support of Michigan's petition. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Next, the court noted that fair value is based on the "intrinsic value" of the corporation as a going concern and, quoting from a1950 Delaware ruling (Tri-Continental Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Delaware Director of Revenue Issue: Whether the Delaware Wholesale Merchants’ License Tax, 30 Del. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Ventimiglia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, March 25, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Chancery Court's decision in Ryan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Larry Cunningham has posted on the recent Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance Lerner College of Business & Economics University of Delaware Lisa M. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
In re G.E.S. (2008-1926) Appeal accepted and held for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith; briefing stayed. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:32 pm
The five-member Delaware Supreme Court unanimously ruled on February 3 in Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:50 am
I am grateful to Michelle Smith de Bruin BL for preparing the following report on a recent reference from the Irish Supreme Court to the European Court of Justice. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:18 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
Bogoff, 402 Mass. 650, 524 N.E.2d 849 (Mass. 1988), and Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
The district court in ASARCO LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Then in 1985, Smith v. [read post]
