Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis" Results 261 - 280 of 391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am by Robert Percival
Sitting next to me was a state legislator from Maine who had flown to D.C. for the argument. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm by Rick Hasen
  See below: Main Topic Republicans, Democrats and Voter ID (12:07PM) In 16 states, Repubican-dominated legislatures have tightened access to the polls. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm by Danielle Citron
First, the Project involves a series of decisions promoting state collateral review as the “main event” for post-conviction challenges. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 But if the work of a Justice was collected and compiled by another, even if it was during the Justice’s lifetime, I have not included such works in my total tally, though I have included these works [in brackets] in the supplementary list following the main entries. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Johnson, the main one upholding the law, discussed here; Kaminski v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
There, the state agriculture agency has told municipalities that their food-related ordinances do not supplant state laws.Shermain Hardesty of the UC Davis Small Farms program thinks some middle ground may be possible. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
   “If anything can be said of the coercion doctrine in the Spending Clause context,” the Eleventh Circuit remarked, “it is that it is an amorphous one, honest in theory but complicated in application.”   Still, it added, “to stay that the coercion doctrine is not viable or does not exist is to ignore Supreme Court precedent, an exercise this Court will not do.” The overall goal that Congress had in mind in passing the ACA was to lead the… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
  Those grants put a whole slew of cases in the hold column:  Davis v. [read post]