Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 261 - 280 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:15 am by Mary Wolff
The Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota holding that an inquiry into Section 36(b) does not rely solely on the Gartenberg factors laid out by the Second Circuit in Gartenberg v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
In light of these findings, the court found a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of plaintiffs’ challenge to the DOL rule, noting that the district court in Minnesota had concluded as much in Labnet, Inc. v DOL, despite its reluctance to pull the plug pending this eventual determination. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:33 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 201959 (D MN, Dec. 6, 2017), a Minnesota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2017 U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
State, 2013 WL 3968788 (Minnesota Court of Appeals 2013). [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The court rejected Herrera’s argument that the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:19 am by SHG
The District Court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Unknown
Reports & journal articles:Brief of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Case O.A., et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:05 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
In light of these findings, the court found a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of plaintiffs’ challenge to the DOL rule, noting that the district court in Minnesota, in Labnet, Inc. v DOL, had concluded as much (despite its reluctance to pull the plug pending this eventual determination). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Jun. 9, 2009) In this case, the district court (District of Minnesota) denied Ecolab's motion for JMOL and entered judgment on a jury's verdict that Ecolab infringed FMC's patent. [read post]