Search for: "State of Oregon v. Long"
Results 261 - 280
of 979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
In post-9/11 decisions, the Sixth Circuit and , in Rusmfeld v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:27 pm
Id. at *5 (discussing with approval United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
School Dist. v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
In Shields v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
” (Frew v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
This requirement contrasts with the traditional approach in workers’ compensation in which a worker is eligible for benefits so long as the work injury is a nontrivial source of his or her disability. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:00 pm
Roquemore v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:04 am
Oregon, the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Believing that Apodaca was a precedent, the courts of Louisiana and Oregon tried thousands of cases under rules allowing conviction by a vote of 11 to 1 or 10 to 2, and appellate courts in those States upheld these convictions based on Apodaca. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
The Court typically writes opinions that are much too long. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
Long, 463 U. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Long and the identification of adequate and independent state grounds to support a state-court judgment (and thus to preclude federal habeas relief): Rocha v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:45 am
That’s because last year in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit decisions are Alexander v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc dba FedEx Home Delivery and Slayman v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc dba FedEx Home Delivery, Inc. [read post]
