Search for: "State v Boston" Results 261 - 280 of 3,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
16 May 2022, 11:57 am by Howard Bashman
Aria Bendix of NBC News reports that “Getting abortion pills by mail is already more complicated than it might seem; Most states have at least one restriction on medication abortion beyond FDA rules; Overturning Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Such requests arose following the leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion indicating that the Court may strike down Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm by Jillian Moss
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]