Search for: "State v Crawford" Results 261 - 280 of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 2:35 pm
"The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case was a surprise, as the court last year temporarily blocked the law for the November election, and voters were not required to show photo identifications in order to vote," writes Adam Liptak in the NYT.A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago, upheld the law, reasoning that it was similar to one from Indiana that the Supreme Court had sustained in 2008 in Crawford… [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:17 am by Jon Sands
Roberts (pre Crawford). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander when there are Crawford issues in state habeas.U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner &… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says this kind of abuse violates the Eighth Amendment, and the case is reinstated.The case is Crawford v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:57 pm
Just today, the Seventh Circuit issued this order denying rehearing in Crawford v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
Bryant -- Confrontation Clause, Crawford, and questioning of wounded victim at the scene.Los Angeles Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:58 pm by Jon Sands
The introduction of the CHR violate defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford and under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:40 am
Danforth was tried for sexual abuse of a child whose testimony was presented on videotape, something the Supreme Court, in Crawford v. [read post]