Search for: "State v Mark Brown" Results 261 - 280 of 1,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2006, 2:31 pm
If Dworkin is right about the original meaning of the First Amendment (or BROWN v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:43 am by SHG
A fascinating exchange between the Alabama solicitor general, Edmund LaCour, and the newest associate justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson, occurred during oral argument in a challenge to the Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Merrill v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
In a separate case, Mark Jeffrey Brown was facing the death penalty for allegedly killing two women. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
Today, it marked that anniversary by taking for argument in the coming Term United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
 Arguing on behalf of respondent Karen Wilson, Mark T. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:17 pm
Concluding that Apple’s store design trademark met all three requirements, the court stated:[T]he representation, by a design alone, without indicating the size or the proportions, of the layout of a retail store, may be registered as a trade mark . [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]