Search for: "State v. Ball"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 10:45 am
Council v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
An A.P. article on Tuesday stated that the 5th Circuit's ruling on the constitutionality of Mississippi's non-economic damages caps will not be made until 2013. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:29 am
Kane of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is uninterested in oxymoronic gimmicks, that much is clear. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm
After the Supreme Court agreed to decide the challenge, the city lifted the restrictions by amending the ordinance and the state enacted a law reinforcing the city's new approach. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
Plourde v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:59 am
McKay v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
SeeDobson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
In 1966 in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:24 am
Additional Resources: Woody v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:53 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court heard arguments in another highly anticipated vested rights case: Alameda County Sheriffs Association v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
The VP, if we are lucky, gets a note or voicemail stating there is an issue. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:02 pm
Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am
To achieve this panacea, Harris and Rand want to throw $10 million to each state, $3.5 million to cover implementation and the balance to bribe the states into playing ball. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
Veteran v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:50 am
This ruling is significant for defendants who have long encountered plaintiffs hiding the ball to avoid removal. [read post]
