Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 261 - 280 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:00 am by Philip Thomas
An A.P. article on Tuesday stated that the 5th Circuit's ruling on the constitutionality of Mississippi's non-economic damages caps will not be made until 2013. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:29 am by Justin Bagdady
Kane of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is uninterested in oxymoronic gimmicks, that much is clear. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:47 pm by Marcia Coyle
After the Supreme Court agreed to decide the challenge, the city lifted the restrictions by amending the ordinance and the state enacted a law reinforcing the city's new approach. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:53 pm by Bryn Miller
  Today, the California Supreme Court heard arguments in another highly anticipated vested rights case:  Alameda County Sheriffs Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
To achieve this panacea, Harris and Rand want to throw $10 million to each state, $3.5 million to cover implementation and the balance to bribe the states into playing ball. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  This ruling is significant for defendants who have long encountered plaintiffs hiding the ball to avoid removal. [read post]