Search for: "State v. Blake" Results 261 - 280 of 931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am by Paul M. Rashkind
" The Oregon Supreme Court reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that the sentencing court–by imposing consecutive sentences based on its own findings and not based on jury findings–violated respondent’s rights under the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi and Blakely. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is further reinforced by a 1994, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Fredonia State Bank, Executor of the Estate of Claytor Blake, III, et al. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Charlton conciselytold the committee that in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
State, 716 N.E.2d 919, 933 (Ind. 1999); Angleton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
  To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites:  Blake v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
" With all due respect, Professor Sunstein, I blogged through a Sixth Amendment revolution with Blakely;  I knew Blakely was revolutionary because lower courts started striking down all sorts of federal and state laws based on Blakely; this constitutional sentencing revolution had been  a friend of mine. [read post]