Search for: "State v. Burst" Results 261 - 280 of 476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
In the beginning I had little interest in the Oscar Pistorius trial; only after reading descriptions of Gerrie “The Bull Dog” Nel’s cross-examination of Pistorius (OP) did I pay attention. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
An armed gunman burst into the store at around 3 a.m. on Oct. 19, 2010. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:48 pm by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's out of the office.]United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:30 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Thomas Ashton Leon DeBauche has posted Bursting Bottles: Doubting the Objective-Only Approach to 18 U.S.C. 875(C) in Light of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
That court had followed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Double AA International Investment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
These dangers are highlighted by the recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lafarge Canada Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]