Search for: "State v. C. Kelly"
Results 261 - 280
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:31 am
Kelly, who performed a “second opinion” evaluation regarding applicant’s left hip under Labor Code § 4616.3(c). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
R. 803(6)(A)-(C); In re E.A.K. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The Associated Press reports here that the lower courts are struggling to apply New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” In Kelly v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
KELLY, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Marvin Lee Kelly v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:55 am
" For this proposition Judge Stearns cited his own prior opinion in Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:36 pm
The Court stated in R. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
Eleonora has no doubts: "it’s Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters! [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 am
The trial court granted Kieran's Motion to Dismiss for C&S's failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
