Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 261 - 280
of 15,264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am
And that’s something even the MPEP section 2173.05(c) frowns upon. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
The DAC recommended all of the works to Etherington Ch. and did not feel that any part of the work was likely to affect (a) the character of the church as a building of special architectural or historic interest (b) the archaeological importance of the church or (c) the archaeological remains existing within the church or its curtilage, and did not recommend consultation [2]. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:47 pm
Judge Rao's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm
” That is broadly (a) the case must affect the defendant’s freedom of speech; (b) that speech must relate to a matter of public interest; and (c) some behaviour of the claimant (at any point) must be “intended” to cause distress, inconvenience etc to the defendant. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 2:27 pm
In Ap-Fonden v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
C. 20543,pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNo. 23–719DONALD J. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The judges referred to the Advocate General’s opinion in Coty (case C‑567/18), noting that the term ‘possession’ does not appear in all the language versions of Art. 9(3)(b) EUTMR (the equivalent of Art. 10(3)(b) TMD). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
As relevant for present purposes, States are considered as injured by a breach if the breach affects an obligation owed to them directly or, if the obligation is owed erga omnes or erga omnes partes, when the breach specially affects a State to which the obligation is owed (ARS Article 42, paragraphs (a) and (b)(i)). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Kenneth B. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
§ 3306(c)(1)(B) requires agencies to “include cost or price to the Federal Government as an evaluation factor that must be considered in the evaluation of proposals” for every procurement “except as provided in paragraph (3). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:24 am
C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:46 am
Moreover, Rule 5:1-5(b)(3)(B) states, in part, in all family proceedings involving child-custody and parenting-time issues, the . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
§ 1.785(b). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In June 2022, Parliament adopted a set of amendments, which, inter alia, allow Canada’s executive branch to seize or restrain property that is owned, held, or controlled by (a) a foreign State, (b) any person in that foreign State, or (3) a national of that foreign State who does not ordinarily result in Canada. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
Hilltop Group, Inc., et al v. [read post]
