Search for: "State v. Canada" Results 261 - 280 of 7,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 3:43 am by Michael Geist
  After State Farm refused to disclose the information, Gaudet filed a complaint with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Orthodox Jews are no strangers to court in Canada. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:53 am by JURIST Staff
As a brief overview, in the United States, the number of discriminatory bills targeting LGBTQ+ folks proposed by state lawmakers reached an all-time high in 2022. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Lawson Lundell
In a recent technical interpretation indexed as document number 2010-0391541E5, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) commented on the issue of whether Article V(9)(b) of the Canada – United States Income Tax Convention (the Treaty) would apply to deem two US corporations to have a permanent establishment in Canada in respect of services provided by one of the US corporations (USCo 2) to a Canadian corporation (Canco) on behalf of another US corporation… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:32 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In my last article, I dealt with the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Bhasin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am by Robichaud
On November 30, 2012 the Supreme Court of Canada released the decision of R. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am by Robichaud
On November 30, 2012 the Supreme Court of Canada released the decision of R. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
  This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:10 pm by Chantal Bernier
 In R. v Spencer, in 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) clarified that the exception of 7(3) (c.1) (ii) did not only apply to warrants, but more broadly “to the authority of police to conduct warrantless searches under exigent circumstances or where authorized by a reasonable law. [read post]