Search for: "State v. Cotton" Results 261 - 280 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Last week’s decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am by Broc Romanek
” On this, the SUM prospectus lists more than a dozen proposed products, including “Thread, Cotton and Worsted Stockings” and “Brass and Iron Wire. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Daily Beast, Geoffrey Stone criticizes Monday’s ruling in Town of Greece v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Sundquist. ** After examining for the twenty-first time — as it has at every Conference since September — a case on the role of federal appeals courts in state habeas cases, the Court once again took no action on Ryan v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity case involving a man shot after police made a mistake typing in a license plate, and Martinez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551 (seventh relist since receipt of the record; a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo); Martinez v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo (sixth relist); Martinez v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
Justice Antonin Scalia is (in)famous in patent circles for calling patent law “gobbleydegook” during the KSR v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo, and Martinez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has slapped a law firm that sought to hire only Wiccans as litigators with a $100,000 fine.In the recent case of Good v. [read post]