Search for: "State v. Coven"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
After amendments to their complaint, the case was removed to the United States Central District of California, which on June 13, 2012 granted summary judgment to those plaintiffs, holding the covenants to be unenforceable under California law and public policy. [read post]
Georgia's House Study Committee on Restrictive Covenants in the Commercial Arena Issues Final Report
2 Feb 2009, 9:26 am
" Following two hearings involving testimony and letters from a number of witnesses (in full disclosure, I participated in providing testimony), the Committee concluded that "[t]he time has come for a change in Georgia law, both to bring our state in line with the overwhelming majority of other states as well as to establish a rule of reasonableness in the analysis of restrictive covenants. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
TSG Finishing, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Contents include:The M/V “Norstar” Case (Panama v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
The plaintiffs asserted causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (“GFFD covenant”), and many individual causes asserted common law breach of contract claims and state law consumer protection claims. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:16 pm
See Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision: Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Eventually, in Stone v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:55 am
App., May 7, 2015) (federal and state claims arising originally from a dispute over a covenant not to compete, ultimately reduced to claims or intentional interference with economic relations, breach of contract, and attorney's fees)DiscriminationHare v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
A prime example of the necessity of a legitimate business interest to sustain a restrictive covenant can be seen in Gastroenterology Consultants of North Shore, S.C. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Amirsaleh v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
In Lee v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
A more useful if less poetic description of the implied covenant is found in Dalton v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:15 pm
Staebler Company Limited v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:13 am
Base One Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
In Frazer/Exton Development, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
Golden State Advert. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:53 pm
The Hiwan restrictive covenants contained provisions that allowed for enforcement of the restrictive covenants, and that permitted the association to perform certain services for the benefit of properties in the community; specifically, the association hired the Colorado State Forest Service to conduct annual surveys to identify trees that should be removed from owners’ properties. [read post]
