Search for: "State v. Cross #1" Results 261 - 280 of 8,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm by NARF
Oklahoma (Criminal Jurisdiction; Due Process) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Cross v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Orin Kerr
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:38 am
Evans contends this diminution of the State's burden unfairly prejudiced him.The trial judge was prompted to give the questioned instruction by the cross-examination of one of the detectives, which inquired as to specific investigative techniques that were not used in this case. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:36 pm by James Hamilton
Against the backdrop of a recently agreed upon Path Forward with the European Commission on cross-border derivatives regulation, the CFTC voted 3-1 to adopt final guidance to provide greater legal certainty and clarity to U.S. and non-U.S. market participants regarding their obligations under the Commodity Exchange Act with respect to their cross-border swaps activities. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am by Guest Author
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:56 pm by Allan Blutstein
CIA (D.D.C.) -- ruling that agency’s Office of Inspector General properly relied on Exemptions 1 and 3 to redact information from its report concerning the death of Manadel al-Jamadian, an Iraqi national who was detained for carrying out an October 27, 2003, terrorist attack on Red Cross offices in Baghdad.Phillips v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:13 am
CROSS-POSTED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PAYMENT The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]