Search for: "State v. D. S."
Results 261 - 280
of 43,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:48 pm
Footnotes [1] See Hamby v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:19 pm
Jeffrey Epstein, the government’s bail memorandum United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:38 am
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., 481 F.Supp.2d 439 (D. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:37 am
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681; [2011] WLR (D) 190 “When deciding whether to grant leave to remain in the United Kingdom to a non-EEA economic migrant it was not open to the Secretary of State to treat the certificate of sponsorship issued by the migrant’s employer as invalid in reliance on the fact that the migrant’s job fell below the relevant NVQ/SVQ… [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm
(quoting State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
This clause, the high court has stated, “indicates” that Congress’s “purpose” in enacting the FAA “was to make arbitration agreements as enforceable as other contracts, but not more so. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:50 am
RB (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 277; [2012] WLR (D) 77 “Analysis of an asylum seeker’s speech carried out by a private Swedish company was admissible in asylum proceedings although the analysts were allowed to remain anonymous and the presentation of the evidence did not comply in a number of respects with practice directions for the immigration and asylum chambers of the First-tier… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:59 am
In any event, the State argued, Wood's claim is foreclosed by Miller-El v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
” State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:08 pm
In Gospel Light Mennonite Church Medical Aid Plan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”)(Internally citing to State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Benedict v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
"With respect to the level of discipline, we wholeheartedly agree with the referee's comment that Attorney Elliott is not fit to be licensed as a lawyer in the state of Wisconsin. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Daprizio v. [read post]
