Search for: "State v. David A. King" Results 261 - 280 of 698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 12:28 pm by David Kopel
More broadly, Bruen instructed lower courts to decide Second Amendment cases the way that Court had decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
Plus: 20 stats about Obamacare Republicans don’t want you to see Asked what he might get out of King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The King’s Speech was delivered by the King on 7 November 2023, announcing the Government’s plans to abolish section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am by Peter Mahler
Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014], in which Justice David Schmidt enforced an unusual, “quick draw” buy-sell provision in the shareholders’ agreement of a real estate holding company owned 50/50 by two families, compelling a sale to the family that gave the first notice of purchase following unsuccessful mediation of a deadlock. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
It states:“the pursuer having suffered loss, injury and damage by reasons of the defenders’ dishonest assistance of Gregory King in the latter committing breach of his fiduciary duties owed to the pursuer … decree should be pronounced”[8]        The liquidator seeks to recover the sum of £28.4 million from the defenders. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
(Briefly: guns made it too easy to inflict a meaningless, unheroic death on fighting kings, so kings stopped leading the troops; and bigger states meant that kings needed to spend less time fighting and more time governing.) [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 4:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court's 2022 New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Sir David Eady heard an application in Cartus v Siddell. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Edwards (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (9): David McGuire v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm by Craig Robins
    I then provided an update with my second post about Baum in which I compared Baum, as the Foreclosure King of New York, with David J. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The issue in the appeal was whether a foreign state whose agents remotely install spyware on claimants in the UK, causing psychiatric injury to those being spied upon, is entitled to immunity from civil proceedings within the meaning of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978. [read post]