Search for: "State v. David W." Results 261 - 280 of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 5:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Two years ago Judge Posner wrote an opinion in Apple v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, David Freeman Engstrom remarks that in Epic Systems v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Matt W. followed suit on Wednesday, regarding state government experiences using facial recognition technology. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The three day appeal in the “data leak” case of Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarkets will begin on 9 October 2018. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Newman, Eweida v United Kingdom, (Australian International Law Journal, Vol 20, 2013: 183-188).Hanna Lerner, Permissive Constitutions, Democracy, and Religious Freedom in India, Indonesia, Israel, and Turkey, (World Politics, Volume 65, Issue 4 (October 2013), pp. 609-655).Engy Abdelkader, Myanmar's Democracy Struggle: The Impact of Communal Violence Upon Rohingya Women and Youth, (Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 2014).From SmartCILP:Michael W. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:03 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: KENNETH JAMES HUCKFELDT v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer General… [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
David Kaye discusses the ways in which the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed under International Human Rights Law as well as the obligations it imposes on States. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Bert Rein writes that “[w]hat the unsatisfying analyses of both majority and dissent” in Ohio v. [read post]