Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 261 - 280
of 3,662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The second new relist, Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Davis, No. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Lund, Discrimination, Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 6:10 pm
Similarly, Revitz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
Davis. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Normal service will eventually be resumed… The post Mea Culpa appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:28 pm
” Davis Next Friend LaShonda D. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:56 am
; The Court did not hold in Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
See Knick v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Nickie Mali Lum Davis pleaded guilty in 2020 to one count of aiding and abetting in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm
Thaler v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:34 pm
appeared first on Drake, Hileman & Davis, PC. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
It might allow for service on a person outside Australia by email or even social media, contrary to historical practice: see Yemini v Twitter International Company [2022] FCA 318, [5]. [read post]
