Search for: "State v. Delay"
Results 261 - 280
of 13,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:23 pm
North Carolina 16-1087 Issues: (1) Whether the burden of proof concerning the reasons for pretrial delay rests (a) with the state, to show that the reasons for delay were justified, as eleven circuits and many state courts of last resort have held; or (b) with the defendant, to show that the reasons for delay were unjustified, as the court below held; and (2) whether a defendant who was incarcerated during a nearly-nine-year pretrial delay… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
Inc. v ACE Am. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:18 am
”); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:20 am
The bench, comprising of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, did not find any merit in the applications. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
The motion is based on a little known United States Supreme Court case from 1971, U.S. v Marion. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:02 am
In the case of State of Bihar v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
The court distinguished EB (Kosovo) [2008] UKHL 41 on the point that without a removal decision protracted delay warrants the ascription of greater weight to a migrant’s personal relationships. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:04 am
<> Pesticide Action Network v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 3:40 pm
O'Hara won in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In discussing the Crown’s delay, the Court cites the SCC in R. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 7:05 am
U.S. f/u/b/o McKenney’s, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
From the Military Commissions’ website, we learn that the upcoming hearing inUnited States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:53 pm
United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:51 am
ShareThe current Supreme Court is undoubtedly pro-arbitration – but after Monday’s oral argument in Morgan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:09 am
State of UP. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
The issue was whether this is a temporary taking, or simply "normal" planning delay and therefore not compensable.Recall that in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
