Search for: "State v. EDWARD C."
Results 261 - 280
of 1,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
A small handful of cases involving judicial review have ensured the CICB continued to achieve the goals stated in the Act in a reasonable manner. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
John Manley and Bill C-34 (37-2). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 03158-19 Edwards v The Mail (Cumbria), 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock, No breach- after investigation 02363-19 Kerr v The National, 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach- after investigation 01641-19 Adomaityte v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation Anonymity Orders Following… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
Halleck Your Periodic Reminder That Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Williby v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Stewart, reviewing Jurisdictional Immunities of States and International Organizations, by Edward Chukwuemeke Okeke David A. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
C. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
§ 2105(c). [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am
ProtonMail trivializes the surveillance state in Switzerland. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:41 am
Edward T. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
