Search for: "State v. Fish" Results 261 - 280 of 3,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm by Unknown
Dunleavy (Off-Reservation Fishing Rights) Klamath Irrigation District v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 10:30 am by Chip Merlin
—Confucius ___________________________________________________________________1J&J Fish on Center Street v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:48 pm by Ellena Erskine
In a 2017 speech, Roberts explained that the two really got to know each other when, on opposite sides of what would become Alaska v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm by Unknown
Farrish (Sovereign Immunity; Fishing Rights) Kewadin Casinos Gaming Authority v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:41 am by Calin Yablonski
The case of R v Kosikar,1999 CanLII 3755 (ON CA) provided guidance as to what the Crown must prove to in order to secure a conviction for criminal harassment. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States (2015), the Supreme Court held that the fish was not a "record. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
Not too long ago, the Third District Court of Appeal held that a bumblebee is a fish. [read post]