Search for: "State v. Flash" Results 261 - 280 of 1,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by Aurora Barnes
 is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA on September 25, 2007, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Jack Balkin explains the startling news: On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am by LTA-Editor
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:06 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Plaintiff Is Injured by another Vehicle While Crossing the Street to Board the School Bus The plaintiff in the case of State Farm v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:04 am by Keith R. Fisher
Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1012-1013 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), and United States v. [read post]