Search for: "State v. Flowers  "
Results 261 - 280
of 581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an… [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 21/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:38 pm
In Zip International Group, LLC. v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire… [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:45 am
From Monday 9th May – Tuesday 10th May, the Court will assess costs in Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Bernier v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Bernier v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
The AmeriKat thanks up and coming IP enthusiast, Jemma Trainor, for the full story:Background: The TX models v the Metrocab ; In typical fashion, Mr Justice Arnold's decision provides a colourful and detailed history of the London cab (from 1621 to the present no less). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:36 am
The options were open to the Justices either to grant review of the case – Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022… [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 12:46 am
Flowers, 547 U.S. ___ (Apr. 26, 2006), the U.S. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 10:07 am
The case is Baby v. [read post]
