Search for: "State v. Franc" Results 261 - 280 of 2,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2013, 12:10 am by Swaraj Paul Barooah
 This post discusses the issues regarding copyright of content posted on Twitter and Twitpic in the context of Agence France Presse v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
  What Washington and his crew were the most thankful for after years of bitter warfare and upon finally obtaining liberty and freedom in this new nation.Most of the toasts were to the usual suspects (at the time):  the new United States of America, the King of France (no small help in the war), the King of Sweeden (sorta helped), things like that. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Graham Smith
  While the French distribution right may have been infringed by the sale of CDs into France, that was from UK websites with whom, the CJEU stated, there was no evidence that Mediatech had any connection. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
We only have to think 'Garcia v Google'  in support of this conclusion (see here and here).What about France? [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:29 am by Team
On October 11th 2011, the 4th section of the ECHR stated that masked police officers “should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification – for example a number or letter” (Hristovi v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am by Jack Goldsmith
Second, if NATO invokes Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, it would trigger an international law obligation on the United States to “assist” France by taking “such action as [the United States] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Various parties ("the Opponents") who were also involved in rubber flooring products opposed this request on the basis that it had already registered the word DALSOUPLE as a UK and Community trade marks for the same classes and goods.In these proceedings Dalsouple France sought a declaration of invalidity in relation to the Opponents' UK trade mark, relying on section 3(6) of the 1994 which governs bad faith: said Dalsouple France, the Opponent must have applied to… [read post]