Search for: "State v. Fritz"
Results 261 - 280
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
(Disclosure: Farrell Fritz represents the minority shareholder in the case.) [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
In Morizio v Roeder, 2017 NY Slip Op 50248(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 17, 2017], Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:04 am
Zerykier of Farrell Fritz, P.C. represent the plaintiff in the case described in this post [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am
Donovan, a commercial litigation partner and member of Farrell Fritz’s business divorce practice group. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
The case illustrated the length to which the state will sometimes litigate to prevent embarrassing information being made public. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
(pictured), in Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Beckerman, 126 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1987), and Muller v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
In a 21-page Memorandum Decision following a lengthy bench trial in Chiu v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
If there's anything worse than failing to specify standards for the alternative valuation, it's providing no alternative, as when the buy-sell mandates use of the stale fixed price, which brings us to this week's featured case, DeMatteo v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Dowd represents the heirs of Austrian-Jewish cabaret artist Fritz Grunbaum in Bakalar v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Bucaria in Gitlin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Mandelbaum Orthotic & Prosthetic Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Barasch v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
According to Piekos, Maher and Fitzgerald stated that the business was "going in a new direction"; that they didn't "really need" Piekos; and they proposed to pay themselves $8,500 per month which, based on then-current projections, would result in Piekos receiving $20,000 annual compensation compared to $120,000 each for Maher and Fitzgerald. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
