Search for: "State v. Harrington" Results 261 - 280 of 437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 5:30 am by Lindsay Stafford Mader
Altaffer Jr., a Dallas solo, represented a disabled inmate’s family in Holden v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am by Laurence Cutler
V. 240/242 Franklin Avenue, L.L.C., just decided by the Appellate Division. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm by Kate Howard
Sellers 16-6855 Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:26 am by Stephen Page
A constructive trust is different from the other types, as it is not dependent on intentions or conduct, but constructed by the court.Baumgartner v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm by Stephen Page
If it was not, in the circumstances it couldonly, and impermissibly,have been based upon his Honour’s own views aboutthose matters.Family ViolenceThe Full Court stated, quoting the trial judge: Itis my assessment, after reading all the relevant police material in evidence,the affidavit evidence and seeing and hearing boththe mother and father givingoral evidence, that the mother is not, and has never been, fearful of the fatherbut that she has abusedthe system in place to protect… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
Warnick Jfurther reflected on the rule at paragraph 48 where he states:48. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing see Harrington v City of New York, 157 AD3d 582, the Appellate Division said although Plaintiff's claim "sufficiently pleaded the first two [the four required] elements of discrimination, i.e. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing see Harrington v City of New York, 157 AD3d 582, the Appellate Division said although Plaintiff's claim "sufficiently pleaded the first two [the four required] elements of discrimination, i.e. [read post]