Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 261 - 280
of 18,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the officers failed to give proper notice of their “purpose” prior to entering the apartment, the AD1 thought the entry was unlawful, and that the New York County Supreme Court should have granted SJ’s motion to suppress the evidence retrieved and that the conviction thus needed to be reversed.That had to be suppressing.# # #DECISIONPeople v Jones [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
Plaintiff's later petitions were also heard. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
"] From Coffeeshop, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
The matter was heard by a judge and a jury. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am
” To read this, one might think that the justices have never heard of a certain institution empowered to resolve such disagreements among states’ adjudications of federal questions. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:45 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases last week. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The decision in Murray v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
The court heard oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
We probably haven't heard the last of this issue. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
I started reading C.G. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
The case was heard in Strasbourg in April of 1981 and ruled in Dudgeon’s favour in October[4]. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
For instance, Romans 10:14 says: “And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
The leading case of Barnhill v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
