Search for: "State v. Hoffmann"
Results 261 - 280
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
And now, rather surprisingly, the Cour de Cassation apparently shows us that Turner and West Tankers can be circumvented by executing a non-Brussels Lugano state's anti-suit injunction, at least in some states. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1129 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
There may, however, be a risk that the rule could be abused by moving assets so as to create, or remove, jurisdiction of a particular Member State's courts. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
On apparent bias, the Court noted that the website for HRL stated: We have dealt with over 3,500 reviews with unparallel [sic] success. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:06 am
Councilman Pete Hoffmann and a few other council members encouraged that course of action. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
As the Court recognised in its decision in Hoffmann v Krieg, a decision may relate partly to matters within scope and partly to matters outside - the fact that the former may be said to constitute the principal subject matter of proceedings does not (or at least has never before been understood by the author to) require a decision, often a separate decision, on the latter in the same case to be recognised under the Regulation. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Although the statute did not expressly state this: 14. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:52 pm
There's an interesting new decision from the appellate division of the NJ Superior Court, Hoffman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Supreme Court upholds selection patents: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada et al (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings)… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
Snyder v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ltd., 368 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:32 pm
Proposed EU information laws on prescription drugs (IPmed) Iceland: Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in Iceland (The SPC blog) India: Roche implements 'mass serialisation' anti-counterfeiting technology (Spicy IP) Indonesia: Patent application on oil palm hybrids (navigating the patent maze) United States: New PMCA research: State legislative proposals restricting access to generic medicines would increase cost $29 billion over 10 years (GenericsWeb) US:… [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Some states close the causation question at the "I would still prescribe" stage. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 4:22 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche (07-1266). [read post]
