Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 261 - 280
of 8,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 11:55 am
Kindley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Holder, the 2013 case that narrowed the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
Sam Levine and Kira Lerner for The Guardian: In 2013, the US supreme court gutted the pre-clearance requirement in a landmark case called Shelby county v Holder. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The US fair use provision states: …. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
” According to these courts, Bruen described the holders of Second Amendment rights as ordinary law-abiding citizens “no fewer than fourteen times. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm
The Supreme Court's 2019 ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Like Vince, I don’t want to spend too much debating the question of how pro-bond holder and how out of step with prior law the 19th Century Supreme Court railroad bond cases were (and indeed how out of step they were with the Court’s understanding of non-infrastructure related municipal bond cases like Loan Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:33 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
Holder, 512 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Any image attached to the NFT will require some degree of IP owner/holder approval. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Accordingly, because Plaintiff’s complaint does not plausibly allege duty, the claim for Negligence (Count IV) and Gross Negligence (Count V) must be dismissed. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Case Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
