Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 10 1/24/22 19-1401 Hughes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 10 1/24/22 19-1401 Hughes v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
There was a wide margin of appreciation left to member states in the realm of parliamentary law. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
United States”Daniel J. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Mendez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
Giving the lead majority judgment Lord Hughes stated that questioning and search under compulsion undoubtedly constitutes an interference with art 8(1). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
Lords Hughes and Toulson disagreed with the majority on this issue. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
In Ford v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:40 am
State, 2015 Tex. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am
Oklahoma State Regents” The winner of the 2020 Hughes-Gossett Award for best student paper is Rachael E. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
Facts: This case (J.B. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
The Supreme Court Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black allowed the appeal. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
From Justice William Crain's opinion today (joined by Justices Scott Crichton, James Genovese, Jay McCallum, and Jefferson Hughes III) in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
I read with interest the Complaint filed by my friend Hugh Fain on behalf of the Rick Perry campaign, seeking relief from the campaign's failure to meet the statutory requirements contained in Va. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Justice Hughes briefly commented on the existence of US decisions that were under appeal, and simply stated they were not taken into consideration in his decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The majority, in a judgment given by Lord Toulson (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption and Hughes agreeing), upheld the claimant’s appeal in Carmichael and dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal in Rutherford – both relating to disabled claimants with a medical need for an additional bedroom. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
