Search for: "State v. J. F."
Results 261 - 280
of 6,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm
J. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
Mukasey, 553 F.3d 743, 753–54 (5th Cir. 2008) (quoting Edward J. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 2, 2021, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(2) and (5), and the matter was referred to the Honorable Sondra M. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
J. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Cir. 2008) (Griffith, J., concurring). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
The Defendant, DONALD J. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
Notes 980 F.3d 1278 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Fowler, 537 F. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am
Retrogression in family- based second preference (F-2A) for Rest of the World countries, China and India . [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
’ ’); J. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Fuerst and Robert J. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
