Search for: "State v. K. J. B." Results 261 - 280 of 1,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 8:43 am by Lovechilde
" Answers: (a) Groucho; (b) Mitt; (c) Mitt; (d) Groucho; (e) Mitt; (f) Groucho; (g) Mitt; (h) Groucho; (i) Mitt; (j) Groucho; (k) Groucho; (l) Mitt; (m) Mitt; (n) Groucho; (o) Groucho; (p) Mitt; (q) Mitt; (r) Groucho; (s) Mitt; (t) Groucho; (u) Groucho; (v) Mitt Groucho [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Statute of Frauds The question arose in the English case of J Pereira Fernandes SA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
For purposes of judicial review, § 315(b)’s work as a statutory limit means that the en banc Federal Circuit correctly decided Wi-Fi One v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:36 am
In particular, Appellant notes, the Information only declared that [she] had `[k]nowingly possessed or controlled’ child pornography. . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am by Susan Hennessey
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:38 am by PJ Blount
(2) PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- Section 40122 of title 49, United States Code, is amended– (A) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and (B) by inserting after subsection (i) the following: `(j) Transportation Security Administration- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (including subsection (g)(2)(C)), this section shall be subject to section 7103(a)(2)(vi) and (3)(I) of title 5,… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
This past Friday Iowa became the first state to outlaw using a pretext to gain entry in a J-O-B when what you really want to do is show criminal activity. [read post]