Search for: "State v. K. P."
Results 261 - 280
of 1,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 8:48 am
Salisbury.Representing Appellee: Peter K. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:29 am
STATE OF WYOMING ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:26 am
BODILY v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:15 am
SANDS v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
THE STATE OF WYOMING and MATTHEW H. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Doggett v The Travis Law Firm, P.C. f/k/a Travis & Hammond, P.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:30 am
Individuals must be in one of the following categories at the time of their enlistment:· Non-Immigrant Visas: E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U OR V · Asylee, refugee, or Temporary Protected Status (TPS) 2. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
State, 213 P.3d 144, 147 (Alaska Ct. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
K 1705 I34 2011 The idea of labour law / editors: Guy Davidov & Brian Langille. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:42 am
In V-1 Oil Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
K 5015.4 S775 2011 The structures of criminal law / edited by R.A. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
DePuy took advantage of the 501(k) process under this law to market its hip replacement system to the public (See DePuy Hip Implant Defects & The 510(k) Process). [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:57 am
Horn and Mumia Abu-Jamal, a/k/a Wesley Cook v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
K 5018 D76 2010 Le droit pe? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Foreword: Buckley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, its content is considered as comprised in the state of the art pursuant to A 54(3). [8] Both the method according to claim 1 and the method of document D6 involve (i) an amplification step wherein as a result of the DNA amplification a signal is produced which comprises signal peaks, (ii) a step of detecting the peak amounts in the signal, (iii) a step of quantifying the amounts to produce DNA length and concentration estimates, and (iv) a resolution step which involves a… [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:08 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
