Search for: "State v. Lake Circuit Court" Results 261 - 280 of 895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2023, 10:54 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
State of Indiana and Commissioner of Lake County, Indiana (NFP) Francis "Swede" Colen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
Guzman (Economic Development; Tribal Recognition) Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit — have interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
First, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling “contravened the text and structure of the [CWA]” and conflicted with the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court’s ruling in April in Kiyemba v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:26 am by Robin Mashal
MGA appealed the lower court judgment.On July 22, 2010, in MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 15-35162. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Last month Michigan asked the Supreme Court to order Illinois to block the entry of Asian carp, a ravenous fish species, into Lake Michigan-a request that has since been joined by Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Ontario, and Wisconsin. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Wrongful Termination)Lundy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The case was returned to the Sixth Circuit Court for a new look under two prior precedents, Carey v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Because Rule 212(a)(5) clearly provides that a circuit court exercise its sound discretion to determine whether the discovery deposition may be used as substantive evidence, Justice Overstreet stated that he would remand this case for the circuit court to do so. [read post]