Search for: "State v. Large" Results 261 - 280 of 28,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:50 am by Janet Lord
 Unpaid labor by patients was a cost-saving measure for large scale institutions. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
At first blush, Judge Cannon’s curt dismissal of Office of United States Trustee v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Gilman
  To back up just a bit, Google, unquestionably, has a very large share of general search in the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:31 pm
  The International Journal for the Semiotics of Law is delighted to announce the publication of Volume 37, Issue 5 - 2024, a Special Issue titled "Legal Comparison Beyond the Law in Late Rodolfo Sacco," guest edited by Elena Ioriatti and Mario Ricca. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Defining social policy to include debt relief, this study challenges a large body of scholarship that focuses on the New Deal origins of the welfare state. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:16 am by Marcia Coyle
Article V states that an amendment must either be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Creditor interests were largely absent as well. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
State legislatures nonetheless continued to pass retrospective emergency relief laws, which faced almost universal rejection by state courts under the federal contract clause. [read post]