Search for: "State v. Madden" Results 261 - 268 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Its legal and economic shortcomings have been documented extensively, but too little attention has been given to the legislation’s maddening vagueness, and particularly—a year into this process—the foundational question of what transactions would be subject to the tax. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Upon leaving the Supreme Court, he practiced with Adkins, Madden, Folley & Adkins then Folley, Snodgrass & Calhoun until his retirement in 1980. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Piwowar even went so far as to issue a formal statement about the lack of communication to him about the SEC data breach, stating:   “I commend Chairman Clayton for initiating an assessment of the SEC’s internal cybersecurity risk profile and approach to cybersecurity from a regulatory perspective. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]